Navigation you can
still trust when
the signal lies.
Gyro Yotta Radian delivers resilient positioning, navigation and timing with autonomous control for platforms that fly, sail and drive through contested environments. When GNSS is jammed, degraded or spoofed, the platform detects the attack, rejects the false position and finishes the mission.
- Detect
- Cross-check GNSS against independent sensors.
- Reject
- Quarantine the deceptive position from guidance.
- Continue
- Fly the approved mission on onboard navigation.
Detection
0.8 s
Confidence
0.94
Active sensors
IMU · VNS · ADS
Response
GNSS rejected
Illustrative operator display · values are representative
The problem
GNSS deception
becomes mission risk.
A navigation attack turns a trusted control input into a source of route deviation, loss of control or collision risk. Availability alone is not enough — the navigation solution has to establish integrity.
Takeaway Treat GNSS as one input to be evaluated, not an unquestioned source of truth.
The response loop
Detect. Expose. Reject. Continue.
GYR separates trusted navigation from deceptive GNSS before corrupted position data can reach the control loop. The operator sees both tracks; the platform keeps flying the approved mission.
-
01
Detect
Cross-check GNSS against independent sensors and flag inconsistencies as they appear.
-
02
Expose
Show the operator the trusted fused position and the rejected GNSS position side by side.
-
03
Reject
Quarantine unavailable or deceptive GNSS so it cannot influence guidance.
-
04
Continue
Fly the approved mission on onboard resilient navigation and autopilot logic.
- Trusted GNSS accepted
- Degraded Confidence falling
- Jamming / spoofing detected Rejected
- Validating GNSS Recovery check
Every transition is timestamped and reported to command and control, so operators keep situational awareness without reconstructing the attack by hand.
Independent sensors build the trusted position
Confidence-weighted fusion
Inertial
Attitude, acceleration and angular rate through GNSS gaps.
Visual
Visual odometry, scene and terrain correlation.
Air data & heading
Independent speed, altitude and heading constraints.
Platform inputs
Wheel speed, odometry, AIS and engine state.
One core, three domains
The same navigation core, adapted to the vehicle.
Sensors, control laws, interfaces and safety cases change by domain. The resilient PNT core does not.
Target platforms
UAVs, fixed-wing and rotary
Autonomy profile
Trusted PNT with full flight control
Operator display
C2 view of trusted versus rejected track
Domain-specific control
- 3D routes with automatic take-off and landing
- Throttle management and envelope protection
- Inertial and visual continuation through GNSS loss
- Attack-state reporting to command and control
Boundary Full steering and throttle autonomy stays platform-specific and requires an approved integration and safety case.
Why integration ownership
Buy a system, not a parts list.
Component-only buying leaves the hardest work — making everything agree — with the customer. GYR takes that work on.
Component-only buying
-
Interfaces multiply
Autopilot, IMU, visual navigation, sensors, datalinks and ground control each get aligned separately.
-
Responsibility gaps open
Integration, testing and troubleshooting split across vendors, and program risk grows in between them.
-
Field readiness slips
Time goes into converting individual parts into a validated mission architecture.
With GYR integration service
-
End-to-end ownership
One team engineers the chain from autopilot, visual navigation and inertial through to sensors, mission computer and ground station.
-
Flexible configuration
Different IMU grades, payload sensors and control packages plug into the same accountable architecture.
-
Validated deployment path
Simulation, bench testing, field or flight validation, operator training and lifecycle support are planned as one delivery.
Faster deployment · lower risk · flexible fit
How we work together
Four phases from mission need to fielded capability.
-
01
Mission fit
Capture platform type, mission profile, GNSS threat level, payload needs, SWaP limits and operating environment.
Output
Requirement matrix and success criteria
-
02
Architecture
Choose the flight-control class, visual navigation, IMU grade, imaging, payload, mission computer and ground station.
Output
Block diagram, interface plan, bill of solution
-
03
Integration
Engineer mechanical, electrical, data, control, payload and operator workflow interfaces into one package.
Output
Configured hardware, software setup, test procedure
-
04
Validation
Validate through simulation, bench testing, field or flight test, operator training and lifecycle planning.
Output
Acceptance report and deployment roadmap
Focused pilot
Prove it on your platform.
A short programme that demonstrates resilient navigation and autonomous continuation on the vehicle you actually operate.
Success is simple: the platform detects the attack, rejects the deceptive input and continues the mission on independent sensors.
01
Integrate
Mount the GYR core, connect independent sensors and establish C2 telemetry.
02
Calibrate
Baseline sensor performance, tune confidence weights and verify nominal control.
03
Exercise
Introduce controlled GNSS denial in a secure, authorised test environment.
04
Validate
Measure track deviation, assess operator visibility and confirm safe continuation.
Get in touch
Bring us your platform and your threat picture.
Start with a focused technical workshop. We map your vehicle, mission profile and GNSS threat level to a GYR configuration, and you leave with a requirement matrix and success criteria.
- Company
- Gyro Yotta Radian
- Base
- United Arab Emirates
- Web
- gyr.ae
- info@gyr.ae
- Focus
- Autonomy · navigation · sensing · lifecycle support
Ready to send
Your email client is opening.
We have drafted the request to info@gyr.ae with your details. Press send in your mail app and a GYR engineer will reply within two working days.
Nothing opened? Use the button below to re-open the draft, or write to info@gyr.ae directly.